Showing posts with label Wells Fargo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wells Fargo. Show all posts

Thursday, February 9, 2012

New proposal to help underwater homeowners

Today or tomorrow all 50 states are expected to sign off on a $37 billion settlement with Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citibank and Ally Financial that will provide compensation to homeowners who were harmed with nefarious foreclosure practices. 
This deal between the big banks and the states’ attorneys general will result in mortgage principle reductions, refinancing at lower rates and cash to the wronged homeowners.
While this is good news for those who suffered and will give some help to the economy from an influx of money at the local level, we need to help the rest of the underwater homeowners in this country and put the final nail in the coffin of this down-economy.
In his State of the Union address last month President Obama said:
I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks. A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won’t add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.
But with the GOP in Congress unlikely to allow any Obama-proposal that will help improve the economy before November, a New York Times editorial proposes another path to helping homeowners struggling to pay mortgages while invigorating the new housing construction market.
According to the editorial the Treasury Department can, without Congressional approval, give stronger financial incentives to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and private banks to help homeowners by reducing the principle on underwater home loans.
If a politically paralyzed Congress is not going to take action to accelerate our economy by reducing foreclosures and thus jump-starting the home building industry, then the Administration must do what it can on its own.

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Gallup misleading Congress and public

Tomorrow the U.S. House Committee on Small Business holds a hearing featuring the results of a Gallup poll conducted in October last year.  The title of the hearing is The Path to Job Creation but the better title might be The Path to Deceiving Congress.   
The issue is the role government regulations play in small business job creation.  The GOP mantra this election season is that regulations are hindering job growth and must be eliminated or severely reduced.  Last year the House passed numerous bills to do just that.  Those bills are now in the Senate where the majority party has a different perspective on regulations and what really is holding back growth in small business—lack of cusumer demand.
The preponderance of polling results last year clearly indicate that the lack of customers is the main reason small businesses have not been able to more vigorously lead us out of the Great Recession as they have in other downturns.  But the anti-regulation crowd has been trying to use the recession both to eliminate regulations opposed by big business and as a partisan weapon in this year’s elections.
The hearing tomorrow looks like an effort to elevate the regulations issue for the media and public and force the Senate into taking action on the anti-regulation bills the House has sent it.
This is where the Gallup poll comes into play.  According to that poll, 22% of small business owners said that complying with government regulations was the most important problem facing small-business owners today.   Gallup’s analysis of this open-ended question (respondents were not given answers to choose from) showed that of all the responses, “regulations” was the number one answer.
I have a Master’s degree in Social Psychology.  But familiarity with opinion polling is not needed to bust Gallup on this poll result. 
First, using an open-ended question is troubling because the decision of how to categorize each response is subjective.  A response might contain mixed messages and thus must be interpreted giving the Gallup employee the final say on what the small business owner really meant in answering the question.  At this point the employee’s own biases (or the biases of the employer) come into play throwing the accuracy of the poll results into question.  It is interesting to note that this was the only open-ended question apparently used by Gallup in this poll.
Second, Gallup’s reporting of the answers to this question clearly shows an effort to obtain the results they wanted.  Here is how Gallup listed the results:
What do you think is the most important problem facing small-business
owners like you today? [OPEN-ENDED]
Complying with government regulations                           22%
Consumer confidence                                                      15%
Lack of consumer demand                                              12%
Lack of credit availability                                                 10%
Poor leadership/Government/President                             9%
Cash flow                                                                        7%
New healthcare policy                                                      5%
Competition from big business and overseas                     4%
Lack of jobs                                                                    4%
It is not hard to see that the responses of “consumer confidence” and “lack of jobs” are simply explanations for why there is a “lack of consumer demand”.   Combining those responses we find that 31% of small-business owners identified “lack of consumer demand” as their number one response far exceeding “complying with government regulations”.
We can even make the argument that “cash flow” is a problem because of “lack of consumer demand”.  That would show 38% of the responses being “lack of consumer demand”. 
Third, Gallup only gives us 88% of the responses to this question.  Were the remaining answers so nebulous or divergent that they weren’t of value?  Shouldn’t the number of these unreported responses alone have told Gallup that the open-ended question was a problem.
So now we know how Gallup was able to report the response to the question the way it did.  Now the question is why?
The answer is clear.  This was a Wells Fargo/Gallup poll.  Wells Fargo and the other big financial giants have been vigorous opponents of the regulations coming from the passage of Dodd/Frank that is designed to protect all of us, including small businesses, from another Great Recession.  Only the petroleum/coal industry has been trying harder to turn government regulations into the boogeyman responsible for all the country’s economic problems.
The PR tactic to bash regulations has been to convince Congress and the public that regulations are hurting small businesses.  But as previously noted much of the survey work last year on the issue didn’t come to that conclusion.  Tomorrow, results of another poll will be released by three national business organizations—American Sustainable Business Council, Main Street Alliance and Small Business Majority—again throwing water on the anti-regulation rhetoric.
It is obvious that Gallup was trying to deliver to its financing partner a response the anti-regulation folks could promote.  Hence the hearing tomorrow featuring Dr. Dennis Jacob, Chief Economist of Gallup, who will talk about the poll.
But to Gallup’s credit it did ask another question with structured responses that undermines the result produced for Wells Fargo. 
Thinking ahead to 2012, what would be a primary motivation or reason
for hiring and new employees?
When revenues or sales have increased                            27%
When the economy improves                                           20%
If you need to support growth or expansion plans             17%
If you need to replace an employee who left                     10%
Having tax credits for hiring unemployed workers             7%
Some other reason                                                           7%
That’s essentially 67% of small-business owners saying “increased consumer demand” will lead to job growth.  Maybe the “when regulations are reduced” answer is buried in the “some other reason” response.

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Small business access to capital

The country’s biggest banks have taken a lot of criticism about small business lending since the great recession began. Obviously, they don’t agree with their critics.

In a recent interview with Robb Mandelbaum of The New York Times, Marc Bernstein, one of the top two small business lending executives at Wells Fargo addressed the issue of small-business owners feeling that big banks with bailouts have done nothing to help small businesses.

A lot of people who frankly are not very good credit risks and who want a loan, I can understand their frustration. But Wells Fargo has been committed to small-business lending for a quite a while now, and we know here that we don’t help our customers, our communities or shareholders by declining a good loan.
What Mr. Bernstein doesn’t say is that the “not very good credit risks” of today were acceptable loans before the recession.

This Thursday I will be in a meeting at the White House organized by the American Sustainable Business Council. In preparation for the meeting with numerous Administration economic development officials, I was asked to develop a background piece with recommendations for addressing access to capital by small businesses. Check it out below.

I’ll let you know how the meeting goes.

Small Business Access to Capital

In early May, Small Business Administration Administrator Karen Mills spoke to the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce. She had good news for many businesses seeking credit. “Lending is back to 2008 levels,” Mills said.

But the news wasn’t so good for the small businesses in geographically challenged areas and our smallest of small businesses. According to Mills, “we are not back in underserved communities and we are not back when it comes to small loans.”

The truth is that lending hasn’t been good in underserved communities and for our very small businesses for a very long, long time.

The demand for small business loans is picking up. For those with between one and 10 million dollars of revenue, Greenwich Associates has found that small businesses increased their seeking of loans in the first quarter of this year by 100 percent over the previous quarter. According to Greenwich, on average about 60% of the small businesses they surveyed received the credit they sought between March 2010 and March 2011. And the majority of these loans came from smaller, community banks. Unfortunately no one is measuring demand for loans and loans made to our microenterprises (businesses with fewer than 5 employees and capitalized with less than $35,000).

Late last year, with the support of ASBC, Congress passed the Small Business Jobs Act which included a $30 billion lending fund to encourage community banks to make small business loans. Unfortunately comparatively few eligible community banks have indicated that they want to participate in this program.

The reason given by some banks is that there is little loan demand from small businesses. That’s simply not true. The demand is there. More likely the answer lies in federal regulator pressure on community banks to avoid “risky” loans, the same small business loans that were more acceptable prior to the great recession.

There are some possible solutions to this lending dilemma for small business if community banks refuse the allure of the Small Business Lending Fund and big financial institutions still are only interested in the cream of small business loans.

1. Put credit unions more in the lending game by raising the cap on their lending ability.

2. Dramatically (!!!) increase funding for small business loans under the USDA, CDFI and SBA (microloans) programs. In addition to lending resources the non-profits using these funds also need a big boost in funding for technical assistance to help guarantee the success of the loans.

3. Allow the SBA to bypass the financial institutions and start making loans directly to small businesses. The federal government now makes direct loans to students through Stafford and other student loans. The SBA already can make direct business loans on its own in some cases.

4. Create a new capital-raising strategy for small business such as “crowdfunding”. The Security Exchange Commission is reviewing a proposal to allow small businesses and microenterprises to solicit investments of $100 or less while avoiding much of today’s regulations.
If the traditional financial institutions will not provide the capital access small business and microbusinesses need and credit unions cannot make up the difference between demand and access, then we should empower non-profit organizations to take on more of the lending responsibility, make direct government loans as we did in our automotive sector and dramatically reduce the regulatory burden on small investment strategies.

It is time to make significant changes to our country’s small business lending and financing system. Conventional practices are not generating the small business access to capital our economy desperately needs to grow