Showing posts with label SCSBCC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SCSBCC. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

SEC to throw open the doors to everyman investing

On the heels of our launch last week of SCcrowdfund.com, which will allow businesses and non-profits to post their business ideas and projects on a public online portal to encourage people to donate (donation crowdfunding) or invest (private placement investment for those with high incomes), more good news is expected tomorrow.

At 10 am, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will hold a public meeting at which time it is anticipated that it will release proposed rules that will govern the sale of securities in businesses via crowdfunding. In 2012 Congress passed the JOBS Act that had as one of its provision legalizing businesses to solicit and receive investments of as little as $100 from all citizens through online portals popularized by donation crowdfunding firms like Kickstarter and Indiegogo. 

The South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce (SCSBCC) and the American Sustainable Business Council’s (ASBC) support for security (or equity) crowdfunding dates back to 2010 when the concept was originally proposed in a petition to the SEC.  The SEC has come under pressure to promulgate regulations that will govern how security crowdfunding is carried out.  Just yesterday a group of U.S. Senators including those who were  critical to the passage of the law, including Senators Jeff Merkley and Mary Landrieu, sent a letter to the SEC calling on the agency to complete its security crowdfunding regulations.

If the SEC does release its proposed regulations tomorrow it will begin a public comment period enabling those with an interest to critique the rules and possibly influence the final regulations.  But more importantly it will give business organizations like the SCSBCC and ASBC a clearer timeline for incorporating security crowdfunding in our portal platforms.  It will truly be a revolutionary opportunity for everyday citizens to invest small amounts of money into growing their local economies by providing capital to locally-owned businesses. 

When the time comes, hopefully in 4 or 5 months, we will add security crowdfunding to our statewide portals (SCcrowdfund.com) for donation crowdfunding and private placement investment. This is exciting!

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Another New Benefit for SC Small Business Chamber Members and it's Free!

Internships.com

Do you need an intern for your business? Don’t wait any longer! Now is the time to post your internship opportunities.

It’s no secret that internships have become an invaluable way for businesses to recruit top student talent while providing an extended evaluation period for prospective entry-level employees. Now, South Carolina Small Business Chamber members have the advantage of posting internships at no cost through our partnership with Internships.com. 

As a chamber member, you can do the following – all for free:
1.      Easily post your internship opportunities
2.      Manage applicants with an intuitive interface
3.      Proactively recruit students using an extensive resume database
4.      Access exclusive resources to help start a new internship program or optimize your current one
Millions of motivated students have already started searching for their next internship opportunity. Don't miss your chance to find a great intern for this fall!

Did you know that many companies make full-time job offers to their interns? Find your future employees on Internships.com today!

Friday, July 26, 2013

Blue Tape Marks Climate Change Risks for Coastal Businesses

Bloomberg Businessweek
July 25, 2013

By John Tozzi
 
Sandy Bridges, the owner of Palmetto Hammock in Charleston’s historic market district, is accustomed to flooding in her gift shop, so she keeps the floor clear of the hammocks, clothing, and tourist knick-knacks she sells. The 150-year-old building she occupies is two blocks from Charleston Harbor, and if it rains when the tide is high, the water comes up to her doorstep and sometimes over it. “The wooden flooring is old ship’s decking,” she says. “They understood we were going to get wet.”

The 19th century South Carolinians who built on the Charleston peninsula didn’t anticipate how wet. Scientists expect sea levels to rise between 8 inches and 6 feet by the end of this century, putting low-lying coastal businesses at risk. To make the threat of climate change clear to her customers, Bridges joined a campaign last week to mark where the high tide in 2100 would be if the worst of those scenarios comes true. A strip of sky-blue tape near the handle of her door indicates the spot. “Where I’m standing right now, the water would be up to my chest,” she says.

About 90 businesses so far have agreed to put tape, decals, or posters in shop windows. The campaign is part of a larger effort to draw attention to the risks that climate change poses to small businesses. “The tourism industry in our state is primarily a small business industry,” says Frank Knapp, president of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce, which is recruiting businesses along with the American Sustainable Business Council. “There’s not much greater threat to our tourism industry  
than a destroyed coast.”



Photograph by Kate Thornton for Bloomberg Businessweek

The American Sustainable Business Council and another advocacy group, the Small Business Majority, plan to release a report Thursday showing that “small businesses with fewer locations and limited resources are particularly vulnerable to devastating extreme weather events,” according to a news release from the group.


It’s not hard to imagine Charleston’s low-lying retailers under water, especially after seeing hurricanes flood homes and businesses from New Orleans to New Jersey. When Hurricane Hugo landed in South Carolina in 1989, Bridges says, the property she now occupies had water up to the attic. She knows that businesses near the sea live with the risk of devastating storms, but she’s hoping it’s not too late to keep the coastline from permanently creeping upland. “If the water keeps rising, I feel there’s not going to be much hope to maintain this area,” she says.

Knapp’s group, which has about 5,000 members, hopes that changing tourists’ hearts and minds will prod Washington to act. Visitors to the campaign’s website can send messages to lawmakers urging them to curb carbon emissions and support clean energy sources. There’s little hope of that happening in the current Congress, where Republicans are trying to block White House plans to limit power plant pollution.

Knapp wants at least to show what’s at stake for coastal businesses in the “very red state” of South Carolina. “This is about protecting the South Carolina coastal tourism economy,” he says. The damage from climate change, Knapp says, won’t be felt “in my lifetime. It might be in my daughter’s. It’s definitely in my grandkids’.”



Friday, December 28, 2012

You’re Invited


South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce

 ANNUAL POLICY SUMMIT


WHEN:  Monday, January 14 from 6 to 8 pm.

WHERE:  South Carolina Press Association
                 106 Outlet Pointe Boulevard, Columbia, SC
                
KEYNOTE:  State Senator Vincent Sheheen

TICKETS:  Free for all members (and a guest) who have paid dues in 2012.  Only $20 for non-dues paying members.

Join SCSBCC President Frank Knapp, Jr., the Board of Directors, BuySC Advisory Committee Members and Chamber Ambassadors for a fun social evening, networking and discussion of small business issues and the SCSBCC's advocacy efforts in 2012 and 2013. 

Enjoy gourmet food provided by the Spotted Salamander Catering and wine from the Hampton Street Vineyard.  Beer and non-alcoholic beverages will also be available.

RSVP to sheila@scsbc.org or 803-252-5733.  You must have a ticket to attend.  Space is limited so get your tickets now.

Monday, December 3, 2012

Don't tie the hands of Consumer Product Safety Commission


The Hill’s Congress Blog 
By Frank Knapp, Jr.

We have heard an ongoing cry from organizations claiming to represent all businesses that they oppose any government action on toxic chemicals in our products, warning of increased costs and job losses. Now, a new independent poll shows that when it comes to protecting workers and consumers from negative effects of toxic chemicals, small-business owners agree with voters in that both want to be protected by stricter regulations.

A national poll released in July also showed that voters are seriously concerned and want action taken regarding the threat posed to people’s health from exposure to chemicals they come in contact with regularly.
This national poll of more than 500 small-business owners was conducted by Lake Research Partners and Public Opinion Strategies. The poll was commissioned by the American Sustainable Business Council, a national coalition of business organizations, which together represent over 150,000 small and medium businesses sharing the goal of a sustainable economy.

Some big-business organizations have dominated the public debate about government regulations, often citing their concern for the impact of regulation on small businesses. Convincing the public that all regulations are evil and a threat to small-business growth, organizations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have made anti-regulation legislation in Congress a priority.

But the reality is that small-business owners are not of the same mind as CEOs of multinational corporations. While the latter are consumed with maximizing profits to satisfy Wall Street, small-business owners are focused on growing healthy Main Streets.

Small-business owners have always had a strong sense of community; they are not just a major part of local economies. They are your neighbors whose children go to local schools. Their families worship in local houses of faith and attend community plays and sporting events. They have the same interests, concerns and desires as the workers they employ and the customers they serve.

The small-business owners’ poll found that:

- 75 percent support stricter regulations of chemicals used in everyday products.--87 percent support government regulations of chemicals used in growing food.
- 73 percent support government regulations to ensure the products companies buy and sell are non-toxic.
- 91 percent support chemical manufacturers being held responsible for ensuring their chemicals are safe.
- 76 percent support tax incentive for companies that innovate to provide safer chemicals.
- 92 percent support regulations to protect air and water from pollution by toxic chemicals.
- 78 percent support government regulations to reduce air pollutants linked to environmental and health problems.

In this poll, small-business owners strongly believe regulations should require the transparency needed to ensure safer products. Eighty-two percent believe that businesses should be required to share chemical ingredient information all along the manufacturing supply chain -- from chemical production to final consumer product. Creating a public, easily accessible database identifying chemicals of concern to human and environmental health is supported by 92 percent of small-business owners.

Small-business owners understand that the way to achieve greater protection from toxic chemicals is to reform the federal law dealing with chemical regulations. The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) was passed more than 36 years ago and has never been updated to deal with the new world of chemical threats.

Congressional legislation to reform TSCA would require chemical manufacturers to show that their chemicals are safe in order to sell them. Chemicals that may harm the public health could be limited and companies would be able to receive government support for research and development for innovation in producing safer chemicals. Seventy-three percent of small-business owners support this TSCA reform.

As we head into a new congressional session, elected leaders need to take a break from misguided efforts to stall or kill all regulations through legislation such as Senate Bill 3468, which would curtail the Consumer Product Safety Commission from protecting children from toxic chemicals. Instead, Congress should listen to the real opinions of small-business owners and voters. Stronger regulation of chemicals to protect our health and safety, and spur companies to create safer chemicals is a goal shared by all Americans.

Knapp is the vice chairman of the American Sustainable Business Council Action Fund and president/CEO of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Was “asinine” too strong?

When told by a reporter Tuesday about the SC Department of Employment and Workforce (DEW) making an error that will cost businesses about $9 million next year, I called it an “asinine mistake” (see story below).

I guess I could have been an apologist for the Haley administration like the president of the SC Manufacturing Association who didn’t criticize DEW but praised the agency for discovering its costly error.

Or I could have just shrugged my shoulders about yet another screw up within another Haley cabinet agency as did the state director of the National Federation of Independent Business who thinks small businesses won’t be affected so no harm no foul.

No, I think the word fits.
------------------------------------
The Greenville News
November 28, 2012

DEW mistake spurs debate about governor's cabinet operations

Capital Bureau

COLUMBIA — Barbara League, the chief executive officerclip_image002 of G.F. League Manufacturing in Greenville, says she isn't surprised to hear that a programming error at a state agency failed to pick up almost $9 million in unemployment charges that must now be billed or used in calculating taxes for nearly 12,000 businesses in the state.
“We've been in business for 95 years and we are so used to those little surprises,” she told GreenvilleOnline.com.
But others are not so open-minded about the mistake caught in an audit this year by the state Department of Employment and Workforce.
“How could you make such an asinine mistake?” asked Frank Knapp, president and chief executive officer of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce.
The mistake is also raising questions about the operations of agencies in Gov. Nikki Haley’s cabinet, coming soon after other high-profile lapses that are costing taxpayers money. A spokesman for the governor rejected criticism.
Sen. Kevin Bryant, an Anderson Republican who chairs a Senate subcommittee that deals with issues involving Employment and Workforce, said he was upset that so many businesses would be affected by the error.
“I'm just shocked that we still have this kind of irresponsibility over there that they can't read a calendar,” he said, referring to the programming error.
However, Lewis Gossett, president of the South Carolina Manufacturers Alliance, praised the agency for finding the mistake and bringing it to the surface.
“This is exactly what this agency should be doing,” he said. “I'm giving them credit for catching it.”
The mistake is just the latest headache this year for agencies in the governor’s cabinet.
In April, Department of Health and Human Services officials disclosed allegations that an employee had taken personal data belonging to more than 220,000 Medicaid recipients, while last month, Haley disclosed a foreign hacker had breached the Department of Revenue, potentially taking 3.8 million Social Security numbers, 3.3 million bank accountclip_image002[1] numbers and information belonging to nearly 700,000 businesses.
“What is going on in this administration?” Knapp asked.
Sen. Thomas Alexander, a Walhalla Republican and the likely incoming chairman of the Senate Labor, Commerce and Industry Committee, said lawmakers should be looking at the events collectively, not just as isolated problems.
“To me, it's not acceptable that we are continuing to have these events occur,” Alexander said. “We'll need to address it in some regard. I think it is a bigger picture that we are going to somehow take a look at.”
Rep. Kenny Bingham, the House majority leader who pushed reform legislation when the agency was called the Employment Security Commissionclip_image002[2], said the events are a reminder that agency directors have to focus on their organizations just as business leaders do.
“It certainly shows there has to be attention paid to the running of these agencies,” he said.
State Democratic Party Chairman Dick Harpootlian said the problems are not unfortunate events.
“They are a lack of diligence and scrutiny and work,” he said.
But Rob Godfrey, a spokesman for Haley, said despite some problems, the cabinet agencies are producing results for taxpayers.
“State agencies aren’t exempt from problems from time to time,” he said, “and that’s why we put strong, business-friendly leaders in place at state agencies who continue to show results for the people of our state – results like more than 29,000 jobs announced and record-breaking investmentclip_image002[3] in South Carolina, more than 12,000 welfare-to-work success stories, transforming DJJ into an agency that trains young people for jobs and erasing deficits at Corrections, Social Services, and Health and Human Services.”
The employment agency error was caused by a programming change in the agency in 2008, officials said, when heavy unemployment claims prompted the agency to begin allowing claims to be filed on weekends. However, the programming for businesses' statements did not match and in three quarters — when the quarter ended on weekends — the agency only counted claims filed Monday through Friday, leaving out about $8.6 million in charges, said Adrienne Fairwell, the agency’s spokeswoman.
An audit during the third quarter of this year caught the error, which could have ramifications for businesses still reeling from the Great Recession.
League said she thinks the programming error is an example of the impact government can have on business.
Other business leadersclip_image002[4] believe the error will not have a large negative impact.
Ben Homeyer, state director for the National Federation of Independent Business, said he doesn't believe most small businesses in the state will see much change in their taxes next year as a result of it because they are typically in the lowest of the state's 20 unemployment tax tiers.
“We should probably not be affected,” he said. “It's going to be your Tier 20 guys who are truly going to be affected by this issue.”
The agency said about 12 percent of the state's 98,000 businesses, non-profits or government agencies liable for unemployment taxes will be sent revised statements because of the error. However, only 399 of those — non-profits or agencies — will be asked soon to pay additional charges, which total $542,249.
Those organizations will have time to pay the additional bill, agency officials said.
The other types of businesses, known as “contributory” companies that make up the majority of companies in the state, could have their tax bills for next year affected, according to an agency fact sheet.
“While it is true that contributory businesses will not receive a bill for these undercharged benefits, each of these charges is counted in the calculation of that business’ upcoming tax rate," the fact sheet states.
Businesses in the state pay unemployment taxes based on their experience with claims, among other factors, and those with more employees filing for unemployment are placed in a higher taxing tier.
Bingham, who said he knows no details of the error and has not been briefed, said it appears to be a basic mistake in accounting, not catching an imbalance between costs and revenue. He said he is bothered it took the agency so long to catch the mistake.
“It's troubling when we have these issues come up time and time again, especially with an agency that we completely overhauled and the microscope is on it and it should be running like a Swiss clock,” he said.
Businesses in the state will get their bills for next year in January, Fairwell said, instead of December as they have in recent years because it is taking additional time to revise the bills because of the discovered claims.
The agency says it will improve its audit process to try to catch such errors more quickly.
That's fine for Gossett, who pushed for reforming the agency in 2008 and believes it will take some time for it to operate as effectively as it can.
“They are doing the kinds of things we in the business community expect them to do,” he said. “And right now, I don't feel the need to jump on them for that. This is exactly what we hoped they would do. Not this example, but go find this stuff and starting making that place an effective state agency as opposed to what it was.”

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Toxic Chemical Reform Good for Business – New Poll


91% of Small Businesses Want Chemical Industry Held Responsible for Safe Chemicals in Marketplace


Washington, DC – American small business owners want the chemical industry to be held responsible for toxic chemicals in the marketplace, according to a new poll commissioned by the American Sustainable Business Council (ASBC). Small business owners nationwide show strong support for stricter regulation of toxic chemicals. The October study examined the attitudes and opinions of 511 small business owners around the country.

“Organizations like the American Chemistry Council have made anti-regulation legislation in Congress and state legislatures a top priority, pushing the myth that all regulations are a threat to small business growth,” said David Levine, Co-founder and CEO of ASBC. “But the reality is that small-business owners see the value of sound regulations to help guide the market to deliver innovation for safer chemicals and products, which consumers are demanding. This data shows that no matter what your political affiliation is, there is agreement that toxic chemicals need to be regulated to prevent risk for business and the public.”  

Pointing out that an earlier poll of voters found very similar opinions on the need for toxic chemical regulations, Frank Knapp Jr., Vice Chair of the ASBC Action Fund and president/CEO of the S.C. Small Business Chamber of Commerce said, “Small-business owners have always had a strong sense of community; they are not just a major part of local economies. They are your neighbors whose children go to local schools. Their families worship in local houses of faith and attend community plays and sporting events. They have the same interests, concerns and desires as the workers they employ and the customers they serve.”

Failure of adequate chemical transparency and regulation in the U.S. denies both manufacturers and consumers the ability to choose alternative materials and products. Consumer choice is the basis of free enterprise. More choices for consumers is better for everyone,” said Ally Latourelle, VP of Government Affairs for BioAmber, based in Plymouth, Minnesota.

"Consumer confidence takes a dive when people learn that they are bringing dangerous chemicals into their homes, because there is no regulation. That's bad for business," said Andy Igrejas, Director of the Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families coalition. "This data shows that, like most Americans from across the political spectrum, small business owners believe that ensuring the health and safety of chemicals is good for our health and good for the health of our economy too."

The poll found:
--75% support stricter regulations of chemicals used in everyday products.
--87% support government regulations of chemicals used in growing food.
--73% support government regulations to ensure the products companies buy and sell are non-toxic.
--91% support chemical manufacturers being held responsible for ensuring their chemicals are safe.
--76% support tax incentives for companies that innovate to provide safer chemicals.
--92% support regulations to protect air and water from pollution by toxic chemicals.
--78% support government regulations to reduce air pollutants linked to environmental and health problems.

The poll details may be found here: http://asbcouncil.org/toxic-chemicals-poll

The only significant chemicals legislation to pass the Environment and Public Works Committee this year was the Safe Chemicals Act. It is pending in the US Senate, though unlikely to receive a vote in the lame duck session. However, with Democrats retaining the Senate, Senator Lautenberg is in a strong position to move the legislation and plans to do so early in the new year. The bill has 27 co-sponsors, including most of the Senate leadership. 

A petition for business owners urging Congress to update the 34-year-old Toxic Substances Control Act was started by ASBC. It can be found here: http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/6269/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=9082

The poll was commissioned by the American Sustainable Business Council and conducted by Lake Research Partners in partnership with Public Opinion Strategies.

The American Sustainable Business Council and its member organizations represent more than 150,000 businesses nationwide, and more than 300,000 entrepreneurs, executives, managers, and investors. The non-partisan council includes chambers of commerce, trade associations, and groups representing small business, investors, microenterprise, social enterprise, green and sustainable business, local living economy, and women and minority business leaders. ASBC informs and engages policy makers and the public about the need and opportunities for building a vibrant and sustainable economy.  www.asbcouncil.org

# # # # #