Showing posts with label health insurance premiums. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health insurance premiums. Show all posts

Saturday, August 3, 2013

SC Department of Insurance releases bogus analysis of data to scare public


The Greenville News
August 3, 2013

“I would strongly encourage the public not to get too excited about these numbers, because there’s actually good news coming in federal subsidies,” said Frank Knapp, president and CEO of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber who supports the changes to how customers buy health insurance.

Health law to hit some hard


Health insurance
premiums for those in South Carolina who aren’t covered through their employers could rise dramatically next year once the federal government’s Affordable Care Act takes effect, according to a state insurance agency’s review that proponents of the new health care law insist doesn’t paint a complete picture.
The state Department of Insurance on Friday released the results of its review of health plans that insurance companies want to offer on the new federally subsidized insurance exchanges that are required under what’s commonly referred to as Obamacare.

The agency’s director, Ray Farmer, said that average rates for individuals buying insurance will likely increase between 50 to 70 percent, and in some cases could more than double depending on age, health and insurance needs.

Those who participate in small group plans will likely see average rate increases between 10 to 20 percent, Farmer said.
Premiums for people who are insured through employer-sponsored plans won’t be affected when new coverage plans go into effect on Jan. 1, he said.

“Due to a number of new federal requirements going into effect next year as part of the Affordable Care Act, consumers should plan for premiums to increase significantly,” Farmer said.
The estimates are based on comparing plans insurance companies offer now to those they have submitted for exchange enrollment on Oct. 1.

However, critics of the findings said Friday that the analysis doesn’t elaborate on other factors of the health care law, such as federal subsidies that will help most customers afford the premiums.
“I would strongly encourage the public not to get too excited about these numbers, because there’s actually good news coming in federal subsidies,” said Frank Knapp, president and CEO of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber who supports the changes to how customers buy health insurance.

The insurance plans offered today aren’t comparable and in fact many wouldn’t be allowed under provisions of the new law that ban limits on pre-existing conditions and mandate coverage for everyone, said Cheryl Fish-Parcham, deputy director of health policy for the advocacy group Families USA.
“Insurance will be covering more than it has in the past,” she said. “In the past, many people faced crazy exclusions of benefits like buying coverage but it not covering maternity care for a woman. For the first time, people are going to be getting real coverage that covers them.”

The state’s largest insurer, BlueCross BlueShield, said the rates it submitted for review were fair but that new requirements must be taken into account, such as more benefit requirements, federal taxes and fees, changes in how companies must calculate rates and guaranteed coverage.
“These additions and changes add unavoidable, additional expense for our customers,” said BlueCross spokeswoman Elizabeth Hammond.

Lawmakers in South Carolina have fought implementation of the health care law from the start, citing an overreach of government authority that requires people to buy health insurance they might not want.
The state opted not to create a state exchange, instead relying on the federal government’s system, and rejected federal money expanding Medicaid.

“Today’s news that insurance premiums in South Carolina may skyrocket as much as 70 percent for some South Carolinians is as awful as it is unsurprising,” said Doug Mayer, spokesman for Gov. Nikki Haley.
About 900,000 uninsured South Carolina residents will have to sign up for insurance or face fines under the law.

In 2014, a person who doesn’t pay for health insurance but is deemed financially able to faces a fine of $95 or 1 percent of annual income, whichever is greater. The fine is $47.50 per child but no more than $285 for a family.
In 2015, the fine increases to $325 per adult, $162.50 per child but no more than $975 for a family, or 2 percent of annual income.

The fine in 2016 and beyond will be $695 per adult, $347.50 per child but no more than $2,085 for a family, or 2.5 percent of annual income.
The fine wouldn’t provide health insurance if a person got sick.

The federal government must now approve the exchange plans insurance companies submitted to the state.
Of South Carolina’s 12 health insurers, four will be selling policies on the exchange with the remaining selling alternate policies off the exchange, Farmer said.

The policies off the exchange will be reviewed in the next 45 days, he said.
The insurance department provided wide-ranging estimates for how the new requirements could impact premiums.

For instance, a person at age 20 could see rates increase anywhere from 5 to 151 percent, Farmer said. A person age 40 could see increases between 2 to 162 percent, a person age 60 between 13 to 134 percent.
The department is “actively working with all carriers seeking approval of filings for products to be sold in the state,” Farmer said.

“It’s a new process for everyone,” he said. “I encourage our citizens to shop around.”
 
 
 

 
 







 

 






 

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

ACTION ALERT!! Health Insurance Competition


Support REAL competition between insurance companies
Contact Senators today
Senate bill 145 will receive a public hearing in a subcommittee tomorrow morning. 

This bill would prohibit a health insurance company (usually the largest) from contractually forcing healthcare providers to charge other insurance companies more for the same services.   These contract clauses are referred to as “most favored nation” clauses because they guarantee that only one insurance company gets the best rates from hospitals and doctors. 
Because of most favored nation clauses other health insurance companies can’t compete on a level playing field with the “big dog”.

This anti-competitive practice reduces the number of healthcare insurance options you have and drives up premiums 20% or more.
Contact the Senators below today with this message:

“Support REAL competition between health insurance companies.  Stop Most Favored Nation clauses by voting for S.145.”

The contact information for all these Senators can be found by clicking here.
Senators to contact:

Ronnie Cromer (subcommittee chair)
Nikki Setzler
Billy O’Dell
Tom Davis
Joel Lourie

ACT NOW to reduce your health insurance premiums. 
DEMAND REAL COMPETITION


Press Release
March 19, 2013
Contact:  Frank Knapp, 803-252-5733 (o), 803-600-6874 (m)

Small Business Chamber calls on Senate to stop protecting
Blue Cross Blue Shield

Columbia, SC—A bill originally filed in January of 2011 will finally get a public hearing in a South Carolina Senate subcommittee tomorrow.  The bill, S.145 sponsored by Senator Shane Massey (R-Edgefield), would prohibit a health insurance company (usually the largest) from contractually forcing healthcare providers to charge other insurance companies more for the same services.   These contract clauses are referred to as “most favored nation” clauses because they guarantee that only one insurance company gets the best rates from hospitals and doctors. 
“Because of most favored nation clauses other health insurance companies can’t compete on a level playing field with the ‘big dog’,” said Frank Knapp, Jr., president and CEO of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce.  “And in this state the ‘big dog’ is Blue Cross Blue Shield—not only in having the most policies in the state but also having the power to stop this bill from even having a public hearing until now.  We are very appreciative of the new chairman of the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee for allowing this important bill to be debated in our Legislature.”

One comparative analysis between health insurance rates in counties on both sides of the South Carolina-Georgia border shows startling results.  The premiums in the South Carolina counties are on average 20 percent higher for small businesses and up to 30% higher on average for individual policies.
“If we truly believe that competition is needed to keep health insurance premiums down, then South Carolina must join about a dozen other states in outlawing most favored nation clauses,” said Knapp.  “Without real competition in the insurance industry, we might as well have government controlled health insurance.  At least then the public would have some influence over rates.”

Most Favored Nation clauses are currently being attacked in a major private lawsuit against BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina.  In 2010 the U.S. Justice Department sued Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for violating antitrust laws with most favored nation clauses.  In 2011 it became public that the Justice Department was also conducting an investigation into similar practices in South Carolina involving Blue Cross Blue Shield. 

                                                                   ###


 

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Blue Cross giving rebates for failing to meet requirement

The State
July 24, 2012


Insurer violated new health care law in spending on claims

BY STEPHEN LARGEN The (Charleston) Post and Courier
South Carolina’s largest health insurer has begun sending out rebate checks to some policyholders because it failed to meet a requirement of the federal health care overhaul.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina said Monday that checks – most for less than $200 – will be sent to individual and small group policy holders during the next two weeks. A company spokeswoman declined to say how much it will be paying out in rebates.
The provider, like some others, didn’t spend enough on customers’ medical claims in 2011, according to the terms of the Affordable Care Act.

Blue Cross Blue Shield said it is complying with the law, even though the insurer views the requirement as bad policy. 

The spending stipulation doesn’t address the root causes of rising health care expenses, such as waste and fraud and lifestyle choices, a company spokeswoman said.

And Jim Deyling, Blue Cross Blue Shield’s president of private business, said in a statement that “our concern remains that a rebate such as this not only creates a false impression of overpricing, but also reveals the fundamental flaw of the legislation, which is that it does nothing to reduce health care expense for members.”

The director of Gov. Nikki Haley’s Department of Health and Human Services agreed.

“In a health care system where it has been estimated up to 30 percent of health care spending is excess cost, these small rebates may be momentary relief for those who receive them, but they clearly don’t target the underlying reasons for out of control health care costs,” Tony Keck said in a statement.

Haley, like most Republicans, opposes the Affordable Care Act.

Conversely, the president of South Carolina’s Small Business Chamber of Commerce hailed the requirement that forced Blue Cross Blue Shield to issue rebates.

“This demonstrates that the Affordable Care Act, ‘Obamacare,’ health care reform or whatever you call it is doing what it said it would do: help make health insurance more affordable,” said Frank Knapp, a longtime supporter of the law.

Blue Cross Blue Shield held at least 60 percent of the market share in eight of the state’s largest metro areas in 2008, according to a study by the American Medical Association. 


MONEY BACK
BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina will issue checks to some policyholders because it didn’t meet a requirement of the Affordable Care Act. Questions and answers:

Who will get rebates? Individual customers will receive checks directly from the company, while owners of businesses with between two and 50 full- and part-time employees, including seasonal help, will get one check for the company’s policy.

What can the rebates be spent on? No restrictions for individual customers. Small business owners can return money to employees, reinvest it to offset future health care costs or use it in another way that benefits employees.

Why are the rebates coming? The company did not meet the medical loss ratio for spending on customers’ medical claims in 2011. It was required to spend 80 percent of premiums for customers’ medical claims. It spent 74.8 percent in the individual market, and 79.9 percent in the small group market. The company won’t issue checks for large group plans as it exceeded the 85 percent target.

http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20120724/PC16/120729651/1177/south-carolina-s-largest-health-insurer-issuing-rebates