Showing posts with label JOBS Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JOBS Act. Show all posts

Thursday, December 27, 2012

‘Crowdfunding’ Rules Are Unlikely to Meet Deadline


The New York Times
December 26, 2012

By ROBB MANDELBAUM

When the Jobs Act became law in April, supporters proclaimed a new era for small businesses seeking to raise money.
The “game changer,” as President Obama put it in the Rose Garden as he signed the bill, was a provision to let small companies “crowdfund” — that is, sell stock and other securities over the Internet directly to the public. “For the first time,” the president said, “ordinary Americans will be able to go online and invest in entrepreneurs that they believe in.”

But it now seems that dawn will break late on this new age of democratic investing. The Securities and Exchange Commission appears certain to miss its end-of-year deadline for issuing regulations to put the provision into effect. And with the departure of the S.E.C. chairwoman, Mary L. Schapiro, and three of her top deputies — including two who manage the offices writing the regulations — some in the nascent equity crowdfunding industry worry that it could be 2014 before their line of business becomes legal.

The delay has frustrated many crowdfunding backers. The 270 days that Congress gave the S.E.C. to write the rules “is not a suggested timeline; it is a Congressional mandate,” said Kim Wales, an organizer at Crowdfund Intermediary Regulatory Advocates, a lobbying group formed in April to represent the new industry, in an e-mailed statement. “The S.E.C. answers to Congress, not the other way around.”

The crowdfunding provision, Title III of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, creates an exception to the general rule that before a company can sell its stock to the public, it must register with the S.E.C., a process of disclosure requiring elaborate and expensive assistance from lawyers, accountants and investment bankers that most small companies cannot afford. Instead, businesses seeking less than $1 million will be able to raise capital online from small investors in a streamlined process.

But the law insists on strong investor protections, and as a result, the S.E.C. must iron out numerous issues concerning how crowdfunding companies, the intermediaries handling the transactions and even investors themselves can operate.

Small businesses, especially start-ups, are notoriously risky; in essence, the S.E.C. is writing rules that will govern a very dangerous game. “It’s actually a significant job to do the regulations in this area, so it was an unrealistic expectation that the S.E.C. would have it completed by now,” said Barbara Roper, director of investor protection for the Consumer Federation of America, which is lobbying the agency on other aspects of the Jobs Act. “I think they have 21 or 22 separate regulations to write.”

S.E.C. employees began accepting comments from and arranging meetings with interested members of the public about crowdfunding shortly after the Jobs Act became law. In those meetings, agency officials “have come in with our white papers fully highlighted, line by line, to discuss it,” said Alon Hillel-Tuch, co-founder and chief financial officer at RocketHub, a crowdfunding site that lets people and businesses raise money through donations or by offering rewards. (Current law allows sites to accept donations or deposits on a product.)

A spokeswoman for Senator Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat who largely wrote the crowdfunding measure, said that the S.E.C. was grappling with the more stringent requirements courts had imposed for conducting cost-benefit analyses when writing regulations. This “has slowed down everything from Dodd-Frank to the Jobs Act,” the spokeswoman, Courtney Warner Crowell, said in an e-mail.

With data for analyzing equity crowdfunding in short supply, the S.E.C. asked RocketHub and Indiegogo, another donation-based crowdfunding service, to provide information about their operating practices and campaigns they had conducted. RocketHub complied, Mr. Hillel-Tuch said.
But Indiegogo did not, said Slava Rubin, the company’s chief executive, because it did not want to share trade secrets.

Mr. Hillel-Tuch said S.E.C. officials also requested help from Kickstarter, another leading crowdfunding site. Officials spoke with a Kickstarter executive in July, but neither the agency nor Kickstarter would comment on the meeting.

Under Title III, companies wishing to sell stock to the public will have to provide information to investors and the S.E.C., including financial disclosures that grow more extensive as the size of the offerings increases. They will be allowed to sell stock only through an intermediary: either a broker-dealer or a specialized crowdfunding Web site, or portal. The intermediaries will have to take steps to ensure that small investors are protected, even from themselves. The law limits how much a person can invest in crowdfunding in a year, depending on income and net worth.

Advocates for both investors and members of the crowdfunding industry have dissected nearly every element of the legislation. “I think there are probably 25 or 30 legitimately important issues,” said Douglas S. Ellenoff, a New York securities lawyer who is advising some in the industry. “But I think they’ve all been hashed out. They have heard issues from a variety of angles, and I think that the draft proposals are fairly advanced.”

High on the list of priorities for the portals is to make sure they face less scrutiny from regulators than broker-dealers do. “What we’re asking for is the funding portals are viewed as sort of a broker-dealer-lite sort of model, where the mandates for broker-dealers are not imposed on a funding portal,” said Ms. Wales, the crowdfunding lobbyist.

The crowdfunding interests are also warning regulators that some of the stringent investor protection measures could, if fully adopted, make crowdfunding prohibitively expensive. The law, for example, requires intermediaries to “make such efforts as the commission determines appropriate” to verify that investors have not exceeded their investment limits, across all intermediaries and stock issuers. But would-be intermediaries fear the prospect of having to confirm this independently, which could entail checking tax forms or creating a database of all investors.

The industry is likewise taking aim at a requirement that issuers raising more than $500,000 provide investors with audited financial statements. “If you’re a new business and you have to submit audited financials that you don’t have yet, it doesn’t make sense,” said Mr. Hillel-Tuch of RocketHub. The law gives the S.E.C. discretion to change this threshold, and Mr. Hillel-Tuch argued that no business seeking to crowdfund should be subject to it.

Calling the requirement unrealistic, Indiegogo’s Mr. Rubin said, “There’s no question that this is a massive deal breaker.” He urged regulators to tread lightly. “There’s a lot to do here, but why not let the industry figure it out?” he said. “Along the way there will be some ups and downs, but in the long run, like the Internet, we’ll have created an amazing industry.”

Investor protection advocates remain concerned about those downs. “The thing about crowdfunding is that it brings together unsophisticated issuers with unsophisticated investors,” said Ms. Roper of the Consumer Federation of America. “What could possibly go wrong?”

An S.E.C. spokeswoman declined to comment on the status of the rules. This month, Mr. Merkley and several other legislators wrote to Ms. Schapiro, who stepped down on Dec. 14, to urge the agency to propose rules putting the crowdfunding legislation into effect “in the most expeditious manner possible.”

Outside observers can only guess at what the commissioners — now two Democrats and two Republicans — will do next. But crowdfunding proponents say they remain optimistic, in part because they feel they have developed a good working relationship with their regulators at the S.E.C. “I believe that with the dialogue we have had with the staff, we will see proposed rules that facilitate a responsible emerging industry with a viable economic model,” said Mr. Ellenoff, the securities lawyer. “I’ve been involved in other programs where I don’t feel the same way.”


 

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Crowdfunding can provide new financing option for women and minority firms


WEBINAR June 21, 2012

25% Discount for Small Business Chamber members

In April, President Obama signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. A provision in the law establishing crowdfunding as a mechanism to spur start-ups has the potential to significantly help minority firms.

A study conducted by the Commerce Department concluded that women- and minority-owned firms “experience higher loan denial probabilities and pay higher interest rates than white-owned businesses even after controlling for differences in credit-worthiness, and other factors.” The failure rate of minority businesses is higher than that of nonminority firms, according to the Commerce Department’s Minority Business Development Agency, partly because of lack of capital.

But crowdfunding can potentially level the playing field, opening new sources of business capital and revenue for women- and minority-owned firms.

What is crowdfunding and how can it work to help your business in the future will be the subject of a webinar on June 21st conducted by William Michael Cunningham of Creative Investment Research.  Mr. Cunningham is a social investment advisor, owner of MinorityFinance.com and the author of the forthcoming book “The JOBS Act: Crowdfunding for Small Businesses and Startups.”

When:  Thursday June 21, 2012
3:30 to 4:30 PM (ET)


Cost:  $75 for SCSBCC members / $100 for non-members

REGISTER HERE


Thursday, April 5, 2012

Hope and danger in JOBS Act

Today President Obama is scheduled to sign the JOBS Act, legislation that has received both enthusiastic support from the business community and scorn from regulators and consumer organizations.  So what is the reality?
Well, the JOBS Act is deserving of both praise and scorn. 
First the praise.  Contained in the Act is a provision for enabling small businesses to have access to large numbers of investors through crowdfunding.  The concept is simple.  Allow many people to invest relatively small amounts of money into a small business trying to raise limited amounts of money and thus justifying reducing the regulatory oversight on of the Security and Exchange Commission.  These are not gifts as in today’s social crowdfunding, these are the purchasing of shares of a company.
We were successful in amending the crowdfunding part of the JOBS Act in the Senate so as to provide sufficient individual investor protection on this new source of capital for Main Street small businesses.  Not only is it critical that small businesses have better access to capital, especially since banks are not meeting the needs of small businesses according to new analysis, but also because we need investors to feel secure in using crowdfunding.  If the public thinks they will be defrauded of their money, they won’t’ use crowdfunding investing.
Which brings us to the JOBS Act scorn.  The rest of the Act deserves concern because it reduces accounting and disclosure rules for much larger businesses, those capitalized up to $1 billion and having gone public as “big league” securities for less than five years .  The real fear is that this deregulation might eventually result in financial scandals that will shake public confidence even for investing in our small businesses.
So while we hope that the SEC writes the regulations for implementation of the JOBS Act so as to minimize potential fraud on Wall Street, those of us who support crowdfunding to help most small businesses not looking for the “on ramp” to the DOW need to get to work.  We need to create the vehicles that the public will use to make small investments in their local community businesses as safe as possible to protect consumers.  If we don’t, this new hope for accessing capital will fade once again for small business.

Friday, March 23, 2012

Happy B-Day ACA and Success in U.S. Senate

The Affordable Care Act turns 2 today (read my op.ed here) while we all wait for the Supreme Court hearing on the constitutionality of the individual mandate to start next week.  More on that on Monday.
Yesterday was a big and surprising victory in the U.S. Senate.  The CROWDFUND Act that we, the American Sustainable Business Council and other organizations were supporting was successfully amended onto the JOBS Act.  Thanks to all who contacted your Senators in this important effort to help small and mid-size businesses have more access to capital without throwing the doors open to fraud and abuse.

Monday, March 19, 2012

ACTION ALERT!!!

Access to Capital vote on Tuesday
Tell Graham and DeMint to do it the right way
The U.S. Senate will vote tomorrow (March 20th) on legislation to create another path for small businesses to access capital.  The Small Business Chamber has supported the idea of allowing limited investments in small businesses with relatively low caps on total investments sought.  This is called “crowdfunding”.  In exchange for limited investment caps, the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) normal requirements would be reduced to eliminate much of the cost and time for compliance that prohibits most small businesses from accessing investment capital.
However, “crowdfunding” legislation done properly is a careful balance between reducing investor risk through low investment caps and thus lowering SEC oversight.  We have worked with a bi-partisan group of Senators to achieve this balance.   Unfortunately, the U.S. House has passed and sent to the Senate legislation (JOBS Act) that includes a “crowdfunding” provision that throws this careful balance out the window and will bring the greed and fraud on Wall Street that gave us the Great Recession to Main Street investments.  
Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana has characterizes the vote tomorrow this way.  ““There's a right way to get capital in the hands of small businesses and a wrong way.  If we take the wrong path and fall off of a cliff, we are going to ruin our chances to get this done.” 
Please contact S.C. Senators Graham and DeMint quickly.  Below are two easy ways to do this.  Your message should be twofold:
Vote YES for cloture on Reed-Landrieu-Levin’s Substitute Amendment to the JOBS Act.
If Reed-Landrieu-Levin fails, Vote NO for cloture on the House Bill (H.R. 3606)
The first vote would substitute the Senate INVEST Act that includes our crowdfunding provision for the JOBS Act.  The latter vote will insure more debate and amendments to the JOBS Act so that we “don’t fall off of a cliff”.
Send your message to our Senators in an email letter provided by the American Sustainable Business Council.  Click here to send email.

Or call both our Senators and give the above message.
Senator Jim DeMint 
202-224-6121
Senator  Lindsey Graham 
202-224-5972
Thanks for your help.