Dear
Member of Congress:
We
urge you to reject calls for a “repatriation tax holiday” allowing U.S.
multinational corporations to bring home offshore profits at a reduced tax
rate. The proposed repatriation holiday is, pure and simple, an attempt by a
few multinational corporations to dodge their rightful tax obligation. It is a
tax avoidance measure that will benefit a few corporations, their executives,
and their shareholders, while other taxpayers bear the hefty expense.
A repatriation
holiday loses revenue and will add to the deficit. While Congress is
working to address the projected long-term deficits, a repatriation holiday is
a narrowly-targeted tax break that is neither warranted nor affordable.
A repatriation
holiday rewards the worst corporate actors. Multinational corporations that are
conducting real business offshore are
less able to take advantage of a repatriation holiday because they often have reinvested
their offshore profits in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, they are paying
tax to foreign governments and would have foreign tax credits to offset a
portion of the U.S.
tax if profits were repatriated under current law. On the other hand,
multinational corporations who are merely shifting profits on paper to zero-tax
jurisdictions can easily bring those profits back to the U.S. and
benefit enormously from a tax holiday.
A repatriation
holiday will not create U.S.
jobs. The
2004 repatriation holiday, justified as a job-creating measure, was a dismal
failure. Many of the companies that benefitted most from the tax holiday
actually reduced their U.S.
employment. Instead of making investments in production capacity and workforce,
companies used their repatriated earnings to pay dividends and finance stock
buybacks. U.S.
companies currently have plenty of cash already on hand if they want to make
investments or hire workers.
Another
repatriation holiday encourages corporations to be even more aggressive in
moving jobs and profits offshore. If Congress repeats the 2004 holiday,
multinational corporations will quite rightfully expect that another holiday
will be enacted in a few years. They will have enormous incentive to engage in
ever more aggressive tax schemes that move their profits to foreign
jurisdictions. In fact, the 20 companies who repatriated the most earnings
under the 2004 holiday are already anticipating the next holiday – they now
have triple the amount of foreign profits parked offshore that they did at the
end of 2005.
We
urge you to reject the proposals for a repatriation holiday. The multinationals
who are lobbying hard for this tax break offer numerous reasons why you should
give them this generous reprieve. But their plea for a repatriation holiday is
nothing more than a blatant attempt to escape their tax obligations and shift
the burden onto the taxpaying American public.
FACT COALITION
Financial Accountability & Corporate Transparency
No comments:
Post a Comment