Friday, June 28, 2013

Small business owners support Obama’s clean energy and environmental policies, poll shows


The Washington Post
June 27, 2013

Most small business owners support some of the climate control and clean energy plans outlined this week by the Obama administration, according to a poll released Thursday.

More than three-fourths (79 percent) of small employers think the the government should set a national goal to increase energy efficiency by half over the next decade, and nearly twice as many believe government incentives for clean energy innovation should be a high or top priority than believe they should be a low or non-priority.
The results are part of a report released by the American Sustainable Business Council, a business advocacy and research organization. David Levine, the group’s chief executive, noted that most of the responses did not vary based on respondents’ political persuasions.

“Small business owners across the country and across the political spectrum believe that clean energy makes sense not only for the environment, but it makes good business sense, too,” Levine said in an interview. “There’s a recognition that these clean energy policies really are better for their financial bottom lines.”
During a speech in Washington on Tuesday, Obama announced several ambitious proposals aimed at reversing recent climate changes and making the country more self-sufficient. Most notably, he ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to limit carbon dioxide emissions for coal- and gas-powered utilities by 2015.

“I refuse to condemn your generation and future generations to a planet that’s beyond fixing,” Obama told students during the event at Georgetown University.
Small business owners support that objective, too. Nearly two-thirds think the EPA should cap emissions in existing power plants, including 86 percent of Democrats and 54 percent of Republicans.

More than half of employers believe the government should also encourage banks to consider environmental criteria when evaluating loan applications and investment opportunities, according to the poll, which was based on 515 responses from employers with fewer than 100 employees. Sixty-three percent support a government mandate that would require 20 percent of electricity to be generated from sustainable energy sources.
It’s a slightly surprising stance from a group that is often considered purely anti-regulations and anti-government involvement, but one small business owner noted that these rules would mainly affect large energy and electricity producers, not firms on Main Street.

Susan Labandibar, president of Tech Networks of Boston in South Boston, Mass., added that devastation from recent natural disasters, including Hurricane Sandy and the twisters in the Midwest, has probably prompted some small employers to take climate shifts more seriously.
“Small businesses are uniquely vulnerable to severe weather events, and there has been a huge amount of disruption from some of these storms,” Labandibar said, noting that her own firm was hit hard by Sandy.

Meanwhile, Levine says the overarching “businesses-hate-regulations” notion has been fueled by policy discussions that have more to do with political sparring than reviving the economy.
“This shows that, when you ask some of these questions outside of the political arena, you get a different take than what you hear in Congress,” he said. “We need to change the dialogue in Washington, and get away from party-line rhetoric and talk more about what’s actually good for business and what’s actually good for the economy.”

Thursday, June 27, 2013

New Poll of Small Business Owners


Reveals Strong Bipartisan Support for Clean, Safe Energy, Including Measures in Obama’s Climate Plans

Large Majorities in Both Parties Want Increased Limits on Carbon Emissions, Energy Efficiency, Disclosure of Chemicals Used in Fracking and More

To view the full survey results, visit: http://bit.ly/ASBCEnergyEnvironmentPollReport

June 27, 2013, Washington, D.C.A national, scientific poll shows that small business owners across party lines, support safer, cleaner, more efficient and renewable energy. The poll, which asked a range of energy and environment questions, including some in President Obama’s climate proposals announced this week, was commissioned by the American Sustainable Business Council (ASBC), a business policy group of which the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce is a member.

 Frank Knapp Jr, President and CEO of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce (SCSBCC) and Chairman of the ASBC Action Fund said, “This poll reaffirms what the SCSBCC has been saying for many years.  We need to protect our small business tourism industry from rising sea levels that will put coastal business communities like Cherry Grove and Folly Beach underwater, flood much of Charleston and wash away most of the state’s beaches.  The solution is to transition our country to a clean energy economy that dramatically cuts carbon emissions since they lead to climate change and rising sea levels.”

Richard Eidlin, Director of Public Policy for ASBC said, “Large majorities of small business owners want the country to focus on energy development that is clean and renewable. Whether Republican, Democratic or Independent, they want the government to promote energy efficiency and clean technologies and don’t want our tax dollars to continue subsidizing coal, oil and gas.”

 The poll, conducted by Lake Research, was designed to gauge opinions on several policy issues currently under consideration in states and in Washington, DC. The telephone survey included 47% Republican, 14% Independent and 27% Democratic business owners.

Key findings from the survey are:
--79% of small business owners support increasing energy efficiency by 50% over next ten years.
--72% of small business owners think incentives for clean energy are a priority.
--63% of small business owners support EPA efforts to limit carbon dioxide emissions of power plants.
--62% of small business owners oppose continuing subsidies to oil, gas and coal companies.
--63% of small business owners support a national renewable energy standard.
--57% of small business owners want banks and other investors to include environmental benefits in business investment decisions.
--80% of small business owners support requiring disclosure of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing (fracking).

 
ASBC is collecting signatures of small business owners in support of the climate declaration, launched recently by BICEP (Business for Innovative Climate and Energy Policy) and signed by 150 larger companies, including General Motors Co., Unilever, IKEA, Stonyfield Farm and more than 100 ski areas. The declaration calls on U.S. policymakers to capture the economic opportunities of addressing climate change. It can be found here: http://asbcouncil.org/campaigns/sign-climate-change-declaration-today

To view the full survey results, visit: http://bit.ly/ASBCEnergyEnvironmentPollReport

 Poll results represent findings from a scientific national phone survey of owners of small businesses (with 2 to 99 employees), commissioned by the American Sustainable Business Council and conducted by Lake Research Partners. The nationwide live phone survey was conducted between March 14-25, 2013. It has a margin of error of +/- 4.4%.

###


The American Sustainable Business Council and its member organizations represent more than 165,000 businesses nationwide, and more than 300,000 entrepreneurs, executives, managers, and investors. The council includes chambers of commerce, trade associations, and groups representing small business, investors, microenterprise, social enterprise, green and sustainable business, local living economy, and women and minority business leaders. ASBC informs and engages policy makers and the public about the need and opportunities for building a vibrant and sustainable economy. www.asbcouncil.org

 

 

 

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

S.C. consumers due $6.2M in health insurance rebates thanks to Obamacare

Columbia Regional Business Report
By Bill Poovey
bpoovey@scbiznews.com
Published June 25, 2013

 
More than 119,000 South Carolina consumers whose health insurers failed to spend enough premium dollars on patient care are due to get rebates totaling $6.2 million from the insurers.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said the rebate checks average about $70 per family in South Carolina.
The rebates announced by the federal agency stem from 2012 health insurer data required by the Affordable Care Act’s medical loss ratio, or 80/20 rule. Insurers must spend at least 80 cents of every premium dollar on patient care and quality improvement, an HHS statement said. If they spend more on other expenses like profits, marketing and salaries, they owe the rebates back to consumers.

HHS reported a total of $500 million in rebates nationwide.
In South Carolina, the state’s largest health insurer, BlueCross BlueShield, owes the largest total to individuals, at $3.4 million, with its Blue Choice Health Plan due to pay $133,357. The report shows Golden Rule Insurance Co. owes rebates totaling $1.24 million; Carolina Care Plan Inc., $701,174; Freedom Life Insurance Co. of America, $171,333; John Alden Life Insurance Co., $167,407 for individual and $17,138 for small group; Mid-West National Life Insurance Co. of Tennessee, $137,200; Trustmark Life Insurance Co., $89,021 for small group; and United Healthcare Services, $47,416 for small group.

BlueCross BlueShield said in a statement Tuesday that rebate checks will be mailed in late July to about 58,000 individual members of BlueCross and BlueChoice HealthPlan. BlueCross spokeswoman Patti Embry-Tautenhan said the insurer’s records do not show that any of its small or large business groups qualify for rebates.
The rebates average $71 for BlueCross members and $15 to BlueChoice HealthPlan members.

Jim Deyling, president of private business at BlueCross BlueShield of S.C., said in the statement that “governmental MLR requirements do not address the root cause of rising health care expenses. We are complying with the law, but our concern remains that rebates not only create a false impression of overpricing, but also reveals the fundamental flaw of the legislation, which is that it does nothing to reduce health care expense for members.”
HHS said the insurance companies that failed to meet the standard will notify consumers.

The rebates will be paid in mailed checks, in lump-sum reimbursements to credit or debit card accounts used to pay premiums, or in future premium reductions. In some cases, employers will apply the rebate in a manner that otherwise benefits employees, such as more generous benefits.
HHS said insurance companies operated more efficiently last year than in 2011 nationally, saving consumers more than $3.4 billion in premiums. In South Carolina, rebates totaled $19.6 million in 2012 and the average refund was $131.

https://www.columbiabusinessreport.com/news/48100-s-c-consumers-due-6-2m-in-health-insurance-rebates

News Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 20, 2013
Contact: HHS Press Office
(202) 690-6343

Consumers saved $3.9 billion on premiums in 2012

Health care law will provide families an average of $100 back in premium rebates

Today, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces that nationwide, 77.8 million consumers saved $3.4 billion up front on their premiums as insurance companies operated more efficiently.  Additionally, consumers nationwide will save $500 million in rebates, with 8.5 million enrollees due to receive an average rebate of around $100 per family.

Today’s report includes the 2012 health insurer data required under the Affordable Care Act’s Medical Loss Ratio, or “80/20 rule.”  The report shows that, compared to 2011, more insurers are meeting this standard and spending more of their premium dollars directly toward patient care and quality, and not red tape and bonuses.

Created through the Affordable Care Act, the rule requires insurers to spend at least 80 cents of every premium dollar on patient care and quality improvement.  If they spend a higher amount on other expenses like profits and red tape, they owe rebates back to consumers.  For many consumers, the report found that the law motivated their plans to lower prices or improve their coverage to meet the standard.  This new standard and other Affordable Care Act policies contributed to consumers saving approximately $3.9 billion on premiums in 2012, for a total of $5 billion in savings since the program’s inception.

“The health care law is providing consumers value for their premium dollars and ensuring the money they pay every month to insurance companies goes toward patient care,” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said.  “Thanks to the law, 8.5 million Americans will receive $500 million back in their pockets and purses.”

If an insurer did not spend enough premium dollars on patient care and quality improvement, rebates will be paid in one of the following ways:
·         a rebate check in the mail;
·         a lump-sum reimbursement to the same account that they used to pay the premium if by credit card or debit card;
·         a reduction in their future premiums; or
·         their employer providing one of the above, or applying the rebate in another manner that benefits its employees, such as more generous benefits.

Insurance companies that do not meet the standard will send consumers a notice informing them of this new rule.  The notice will also let consumers know how much the insurer did or did not spend on patient care or quality improvement, and how much of that difference will be returned as a rebate.

The 80/20 rule, along with the required review of proposed double-digit premium increases, works to stabilize and moderate premium rates.  And, with the new market reforms, including the guaranteed availability protections and prohibition of the use of factors such as health status, medical history, gender and industry of employment to set premiums rates, this policy helps ensure every American has access to quality, affordable health insurance.



 

Public Hearing on Duke Energy's Proposed Rate Hike Thursday in Anderson

Public hearings on Duke Energy's proposed average 15.1% electric rate hike continue tomorrow night, June 27th,  in Anderson. That hearing will start at 6 PM in the Anderson Civic Center, Ballrooms A&B, 3027 MLK Jr. Blvd., Anderson.

Attend the hearing and let the SC Public Service Commission know how you feel about the rate hike. The SC Small Business Chamber is intervening in the rate case to oppose the rate increase. More on that later.
The next public hearing will be held on August 1st  evening at 6PM in Columbia at the Public Service Commission, 101 Executive Cener Drive, Columbia.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Watch President Obama's speech on climate change today at 1:35PM EST


At 1:35 pm EST today, June 25th, President Obama will speak at Georgetown University on the growing threat of climate change. He will lay out his vision of where we need to go to do what we can to address and prepare for the serious implications of a changing climate. Tune in at whitehouse.gov/live. A video preview is available here

Monday, June 24, 2013

Public Hearing on Duke Energy's Proposed Rate Hike Tonight in Greenville

Public hearings on Duke Energy's proposed average 15.1% electric rate hike continue tonight in Greenville. That hearing will start at 6 PM in the Greenville County Council Chambers, 301 University Ridge, Suite 2400, Greenville.

Attend the hearing and let the SC Public Service Commission know how you feel about the rate hike. The SC Small Business Chamber is intervening in the rate case to oppose the rate increase. More on that later.
 
The next public hearing will be held this Thursday evening at 6PM in Anderson at the Anderson Civic Center.








 

 

Friday, June 21, 2013

Small Business Chamber opposes Duke rate hike


GSA Business Journal
June 21, 2013
The president of the S.C. Small Business Chamber of Commerce said before the first public hearing on Duke Energy’s request for a third rate increase since 2010 that the request is “not justified and particularly not justified for small businesses.” Frank Knapp Jr. has filed as an intervenor in the rate case.
By Bill Poovey


The president of the S.C. Small Business Chamber of Commerce said before the first public hearing on Duke Energy’s request for a third rate increase since 2010 that the request is “not justified and particularly not justified for small businesses.”
Frank Knapp Jr. has filed as an intervenor in the rate case.

“We are opposing the proposed rate hike,” said Knapp, whose Columbia-based group has more than 5,000 members. “There is no justification for it. The rate of return on equity is way too high.”
The utility is seeking to increase rates by an average of 15.1% to boost revenues by $221 million annually.

The request would increase rates by an average 16.3% for residential customers, 14% for commercial customers and 14.4% for industrial users. Duke Energy’s rates in South Carolina are among the lowest in the Southeast, but rates are determined in part by utilities’ profit margins, or return on equity. Duke is requesting a return on equity of 11.25%, up from 10.5%. The PSC will determine whether to allow that increased profit margin and decide what the 540,000 retail customers in the state can afford.
Ryan Mosier, a spokesman for the utility in Greenville, said previously that the rate increase application is based on the actual costs of new power plants and upgrades, as well as the 11.25% return on equity rate recommended by outside consultants. He said that maximum profit margin is a limit, not a guarantee.

“Like any other business, we still must manage our business and costs to achieve a return on our investments,” he said.
The filing for higher rates could start hitting customers’ pocketbooks in the fall. It follows two recent increases for the Charlotte-based utility. In 2010, Duke sought a 7.2% increase, or $104 million, and was allowed a 5.2% increase, or $74 million. In 2012, Duke sought a 14.2% hike to raise annual revenues by $216 million. The PSC approved a 6% increase that added $93 million in new revenues.

Duke wants the extra revenue mainly to provide $673 million for the new Dan River natural gas plant in Eden, N.C.; $236 million for high-efficiency technology at its Cliffside Steam Station in Mooresboro, N.C.; $141 million for safety and security measures at the Oconee Nuclear Station near Seneca; and $135 million for upgrades at the McGuire Nuclear Station in Mecklenburg County, N.C.
Knapp made the comment hours before the S.C. Public Service Commission’s public hearing on the request at Spartanburg Community College, the first in a series of hearings also set in Greenville, Anderson and Columbia.

The PSC takes up the increase in Columbia starting July 31.
The schedule for the remaining hearings that start at 6 p.m.:

  • June 24, Greenville County Council Chambers, 301 University Ridge, Suite 2400, Greenville.
  • June 27, Anderson Civic Center, Ballrooms A&B, 3027 MLK Jr. Blvd., Anderson.
  • Aug. 1, Public Service Commission, 101 Executive Center Drive, Columbia.